On 01/03/14 09:57, David Faure wrote: > On Wednesday 26 February 2014 14:36:49 Nicolas Lécureuil wrote: >> as there is already a kdnssd tarball for kde 4, i think this would be safer >> to keep the -framework in the name. > > I can't see how the name of the kde-sc-4 tarballs matter? > > This is version 5 of the thing.... > > Just like attica4/attica5, kactivities4/kactivities5, dolphin4/dolphin5 etc. > etc. It's not like everything has to have a new name (even though most > frameworks indeed have a new name that wasn't used before, but that's not a > requirement)
If we rename the kdnssd repo to zeroconf-ioslave, we'll at least have to account for that in the release scripts. But I guess the release scripts can be made to generate a kdnssd (or kdenetwork-kdnssd or whatever) tarball from the zeroconf-ioslave repo. Alex _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
