On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 6:57 AM Sune Vuorela <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2025-11-27, Albert Astals Cid <[email protected]> wrote: > > I feel we are not fullfilling this promise nowadays since [almost] no > > developer runs such old Qt and we don't have CI for it either so things that > > don't compile with older versions sneak up. Increasing the promise to yet > > another older Qt without extra CI for it feels like it would be an empty > > promise. > > I've been testing it so far with 6.7 with non-frequent intervals. > Occasionally a patch was needed. > > (Note: I only tested what's needed for Okular & Kleopatra, not the 'full > frameworks', but it get pretty good around) >
It's been appreciated by some third-party ISVs, since they go out of their way to pay for Qt LTS and have considered using some KDE Frameworks (at least when I inform them of the existence of the Frameworks), so I would prefer if we could if reasonably possible. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
