dfaure added a comment.

  I have a hard time accepting that the documentation was wrong -- and if it 
was, then this commit has to fix it, and port as much of the app code that does 
exactly this, as possible.
  
  I don't really know what mReference is. What about a test that uses KConfig 
directly (no skeletons), to test e.g. what kwindowconfig.cpp?
  Sorry to be a non-believer, I just sense a very strong risk of regression 
here, and if not, then a lot of porting effort. Unless there's a good reason 
for this stuff to be that way, that we still have to find out.
  
  I lack time and concentration right now to dig further, but I wanted to not 
delay my reply longer.

REPOSITORY
  R237 KConfig

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D28221

To: bport, ervin, dfaure, davidedmundson
Cc: kde-frameworks-devel, LeGast00n, cblack, GB_2, michaelh, ngraham, bruns

Reply via email to