On 01/13/2014 08:40 PM, Kevin Ottens wrote: > On Monday 13 January 2014 20:12:31 Valentin Rusu wrote: >> On 01/13/2014 07:54 PM, David Faure wrote: >>> On Monday 13 January 2014 16:48:52 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: >>>> 2014/1/13 David Faure <fa...@kde.org>: >>>> >>>> If you rename kwallet to kwalletmanager and kwallet-framework to >>>> kwallet, people with a clone of "kwallet.git" will get a mess the next >>>> time they pull from the server, as the entire repository/history will >>>> have changed. >>> >>> Maybe kwallet -> kwalletmanager, then wait for a few months, >>> then kwallet-framework-> kwallet? >>> >>> That would give time to anyone having a kwallet clone to get errors >>> and re-clone? >> >> Here is one more reason to move kwalletmanager (aka kdeutils/kwallet) in >> kwallet-framework. Then there'll be no more such problems. >> >> Will that be acceptable for our packagers? > > Honestly I think that makes sense to keep the manager application from the > daemon and interface. We don't provide the KCM to control the emoticons with > kemoticons for instance, it's more workspace stuff.
Well, I see. So I'll do like David sugests.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
