On Monday 13 January 2014 20:12:31 Valentin Rusu wrote: > On 01/13/2014 07:54 PM, David Faure wrote: > > On Monday 13 January 2014 16:48:52 Nicolás Alvarez wrote: > >> 2014/1/13 David Faure <fa...@kde.org>: > >> > >> If you rename kwallet to kwalletmanager and kwallet-framework to > >> kwallet, people with a clone of "kwallet.git" will get a mess the next > >> time they pull from the server, as the entire repository/history will > >> have changed. > > > > Maybe kwallet -> kwalletmanager, then wait for a few months, > > then kwallet-framework-> kwallet? > > > > That would give time to anyone having a kwallet clone to get errors > > and re-clone? > > Here is one more reason to move kwalletmanager (aka kdeutils/kwallet) in > kwallet-framework. Then there'll be no more such problems. > > Will that be acceptable for our packagers?
Honestly I think that makes sense to keep the manager application from the daemon and interface. We don't provide the KCM to control the emoticons with kemoticons for instance, it's more workspace stuff. Regards. -- Kévin Ottens, http://ervin.ipsquad.net KDAB - proud supporter of KDE, http://www.kdab.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
