Kevin Ottens wrote: >> Stephen Kelly wrote: >>It's not my decision either. It's just a recommendation. >> >> Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: >>I object. >>What's the big impediment of releasing ECM? If there's an impediment, >>let's fix it. > > I agree with Aleix here. I think it's important that the first frameworks > we'll release are as close as possible to the final situation, ECM should > be releasable by then. If something blocks that, we should try to solve > it. >
ReviewBoard is not suited for non-patch discussion. One problem is that we have a CMakePackageConfigHelpers.cmake fork in ECM. That fork is no longer needed as of cmake master. Things like http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.kde.devel.buildsystem/7994/focus=6969 could also be solved by teaching CMake something more about tests (not done yet, but I see no reason why worthwhile improvements there would not be accepted). That could obsolete ecm_mark_as_test etc. Thanks, Steve. _______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
