> On Oct. 21, 2013, 8:06 p.m., Stephen Kelly wrote: > > As far as I know, only threadweaver and karchive will be released in > > December. The rest of the frameworks won't be released until summer. > > > > By summer, CMake 3.0.0 will most likely be out. > > Volker Krause wrote: > while the CMake 3 solution is obviously much nicer, what are our > alternatives until then? The current solution is adding -std=c++0x without > proper compiler checks ad-hoc where needed, I think that's far worse than > this change. Also, it wont detect incompatibilities with C++11 in currently > C++98-only code paths. And changes here are needed anyway, since -ansi > effectively prevents you from enabling C++11 (which also suggests ICC hasn't > been tested in quite a while). > > > Ivan Čukić wrote: > +1 > > Stephen Kelly wrote: > Fair enough. > > I don't recommend releasing ecm with this though. > > I don't see any reason to release ecm when releasing KArchive and > Threadweaver. I recommend just copying needed files into the first release of > those instead. > > Alexander Neundorf wrote: > I.e. both will have copies of ECMSetupVersion.cmake, > ECMVersionHeader.h.in, KDEInstallDirs.cmake, KDECompilerSettings.cmake and > KDECMakeSettings.cmake ? > This is just so much against what was originally, at least my, idea of > e-c-m: make cmake stuff we have in KDE, but which can be useful also in other > projects, easier and quicker available to others (instead of not being able > to release it when the first frameworks are released). > But I don't object, it's your decision. > > > Stephen Kelly wrote: > It's not my decision either. It's just a recommendation. > > Aleix Pol Gonzalez wrote: > I object. > What's the big impediment of releasing ECM? If there's an impediment, > let's fix it.
I agree with Aleix here. I think it's important that the first frameworks we'll release are as close as possible to the final situation, ECM should be releasable by then. If something blocks that, we should try to solve it. - Kevin ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/#review42130 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Oct. 21, 2013, 6:51 p.m., Volker Krause wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Oct. 21, 2013, 6:51 p.m.) > > > Review request for Extra Cmake Modules, KDE Frameworks and Stephen Kelly. > > > Repository: extra-cmake-modules > > > Description > ------- > > Enable C++11 support by default. > > > Diffs > ----- > > kde-modules/KDECompilerSettings.cmake > b745ec3c52fe66b3cfb89a334c99a5ea8ef71d4d > > Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113373/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > Compiles, all required fixes have been integrated into the frameworks branch > by now (at least for the subset I have the required dependencies for). > > > Thanks, > > Volker Krause > >
_______________________________________________ Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel
