On Friday 18 January 2013 11:34:13 Jon Severinsson wrote:
> This is essentially a small subset of my review 108263. I see nothing wrong
> with it, but I think it is unnecessary as we could just push my more
> extensive patch directly instead.

Yes, please push 108263 then, and let's declare Qt5 required at the same time.

John (Layt), please review http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108263 at your 
convenience (before or after it gets pushed --- we'll still have plenty of 
time to revisit it if necessary).

Let's move on, everything else is ready :-)

-- 
David Faure, fa...@kde.org, http://www.davidfaure.fr
Working on KDE, in particular KDE Frameworks 5

_______________________________________________
Kde-frameworks-devel mailing list
Kde-frameworks-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-frameworks-devel

Reply via email to