Thanks for explanations. I will use this option in the future. Gilles Caulier
2016-12-27 23:08 GMT+01:00 Luigi Toscano <[email protected]>: > Gilles Caulier ha scritto: > > What's the advantage to use this option. None from my side. > > This is the proper git way to give credits to the author of a patch. It is > one > big advantage over SVN and it requires just few characters more to type > when > you commit the change. This means that it's not a cost and it shows the > proper > authorship in the history. Please try it. If you don't want, I would be > happy > to review and commit the changes for digikam-docs. > > https://www.mcdruid.co.uk/content/git-commit-author- > give-credit-where-credit-is-due > https://www.drupal.org/node/52287 > > Soon you will also be able to use phabricator to approve the reviews for > digikam-docs (and the other project), and phabricator will take care of > adding > the proper reviewers. > > > > Gilles > > > > 2016-12-27 22:44 GMT+01:00 Luigi Toscano <[email protected] > > <mailto:[email protected]>>: > > > > Gilles Caulier ha scritto: > > > Git commit 5844e20947e2c642926d06d586bb29cf2fa9a66a by Gilles > Caulier. > > > Committed on 27/12/2016 at 21:41. > > > Pushed by cgilles into branch 'master'. > > > > Hi again! > > Did you find any issue while using git commit --author? I see that > this commit > > still has your details as author. Can I help in any way with this? > > > > > > -- > > Luigi > > > > > >
