Burkhard Lück ha scritto: > Hi, > > we have a problem with the Digikam + Kipi-Plugin Docbooks in foreseen future > more than already now and in the past. > > From my pov it was a big failure to put the digikam and kiipiplugins docs > into > their own repos separated from the code where the docbooks silently bitrot. > > Years ago (around gigikam 3.7?) I started to cleanup + update kipi docbooks, > but gave up due to all the problems in nearly all digikam/kipi releases from > 3.7 to now (missing en docbooks, missing translated docbooks, missing gui > translations...) > > I see a lot of cleanup (move/rename/delete) in kipi in preparation for kf5 > now, therefore the corresponding docbooks will be useless in kf5, so we would > have to ignore them and should no longer track them for translation in the > current status. > > What about this plan: > > 1) File a review request for digikam/kipi to move/copy both doc repos back > into the code repos
+1 for doc-follows-the-code. Ciao -- Luigi
