El Dissabte, 4 de juliol de 2015, a les 11:37:41, Burkhard Lück va escriure: > Hi, > > we have a problem with the Digikam + Kipi-Plugin Docbooks in foreseen future > more than already now and in the past. > > From my pov it was a big failure to put the digikam and kiipiplugins docs > into their own repos separated from the code where the docbooks silently > bitrot. > > Years ago (around gigikam 3.7?) I started to cleanup + update kipi docbooks, > but gave up due to all the problems in nearly all digikam/kipi releases > from 3.7 to now (missing en docbooks, missing translated docbooks, missing > gui translations...) > > I see a lot of cleanup (move/rename/delete) in kipi in preparation for kf5 > now, therefore the corresponding docbooks will be useless in kf5, so we > would have to ignore them and should no longer track them for translation > in the current status. > > What about this plan: > > 1) File a review request for digikam/kipi to move/copy both doc repos back > into the code repos > 2) Maybe leave the old doc repos read only in git > 3) we strip down the docbooks in the code repos to basic information we are > able to keep up to date. > > Alternativly we should skip digikam + kipi docbooks completely. > > Comments?
My vote goes for 1. Cheers, Albert
