Hi, On Thursday, July 3rd, 2025 at 18:50, Łukasz Wojniłowicz <lukasz.wojnilow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 25-07-03 18:33, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 03.07.25 um 18:27 schrieb Łukasz Wojniłowicz: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > recently I got an answer like at https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi? > > > id=506334#c12 and was shocked. > > > Being accused of being insulting, while trying to find the root > > > cause of the issue and then commanded for this bug not rolling out > > > perfectly from the beginning. > > > All with the mix of all caps words. > > > Anybody subscribes to this way of expression? > > > > > > I'm not sure, if that's the right place. The Code of Conduct site at > > > https://kde.org/code-of-conduct/ doesn't contain any address for > > > reporting incidents. > > > bugreports without steps to reproduce and no backtrace are simply > > > useless - how do you imagine anybody to work with that? > > Did you look into the report? In the first comment it has backtrace and > description of activity when it crashes. It looked like random then. The 'STEPS TO REPRODUCE' is just the quote of what is in the template, that is repeated once more with 'EXACT' added. That might not be the most gentle comment I have ever seen, but IMHO that is just not polite and no CoC incident. We are all human and I would assume one can bit a bit lenient with the developers that actually at all care and read bugs and often stumble above missing points. Greetings Christoph > -- > Cheers, > Łukasz
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
