Hi, I have the feeling that two topics are being mixed here. One is AI and the other one is spam.
12.05.2025 15:41:41 Akseli <akse...@akselmo.dev>: > On 12 May 2025 16.28.02 EEST, Jin Liu <m.liu....@gmail.com> wrote: >> Akseli <akse...@akselmo.dev> 于2025年5月12日周一 20:53写道： >>> We should take a more public stance on disallowing all this slop. Lengthy >>> gitlab issues that are just full of nonsense generated by a bot just take >>> time out of everyones schedules, trying to decipher if its serious or not. >> >> I assume this doesn't include auto-completions done by Github Copilot? >> Because currently I guess it types ~70% of code and commit messages >> for me. And I would only accept when it types exactly what's in my >> mind. So I don't see if that's any different from "traditional" >> auto-completion in IDE and Chinese IME. >> >> -jin > > I'm mostly concerned about bug reports and such written by these bots. > Bug reports written by bots sound to me like spam independently of whether AI is involved. > My pragmatic stance is: As long as your code works and doesn't overcomplicate > things, I don't see that much of an issue. > > My more idealistic stance is banning these tools KDE wide because of how > unethical they can be, and how bad they can be from ecological sense. > That would be the part of the discussion that is AI related. > Anyway, I just want get rid of the AI slop spam, be it code or bug reports: > the lengthy SEO'd messages with useless information in them. > Not having seen such a report myself yet, your description sounds as if it is off-topic. Which again means it can be considered spam regardless of how it is generated. I don't think a policy will help to keep bots away. It could help though if it is a natural person writing low quality reports with the help of AI on a valid topic / bug. > - Aks Julius Julius Künzel KDE Developer Matrix: @jlskuz:kde.org KDE GitLab: https://invent.kde.org/jlskuz
