On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:34 AM Alexander Semke <alexander.se...@web.de> wrote:
> On 12/02/25 09:25, Ben Cooksley wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:02 PM Alexander Semke > > <alexander.se...@web.de> wrote: > > > > On 12/02/25 00:41, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing > > CI jobs on > > > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing > > for multiple > > > reasons. > > > > > > Good news: 1 repository was fixed > > > > > > Bad news: 1 repository started failing, 1 is still failing > > > > > > > > > cantor - 3rd week - LAST WEEK BEFORE TEST REMOVAL > > > * https://invent.kde.org/education/cantor/-/pipelines/884127 > > > * testmaxima fails > > > > I'm looking into this problem now. It's working locally without any > > problems and there were no code changes in in Cantor's repository > > in the > > last weeks. > > > > > > On CI maxima fails to start with| > > | > > > > |fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 5186 tid 5186:\ncore was > > built for > > runtime \"hostname-id-1735813044\" but this is > > \"hostname-id-1736350757\"| > > > > | > > | > > > > This seems to be a build issue in Tumbleweed. > > > > > > Ben, was a new image created three weeks ago which can explain why > > these > > tests started to fail? I assume this problem is already fixed in > > Tumbleweed. Any chance to pull the new versions of maxima and > > maxima-exec-sbcl? > > > > > > The SUSE image was re-generated a week ago - see > > https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-images/-/jobs (Finished tab, then > > search for the image you are looking for) > > > > Comparing vs. the latest build logs for Maxima on the OBS ( > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/maxima -> > > > https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/maxima/standard/x86_64 > > ) it looks like there has been a version bump. > > > > I've triggered > > https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-images/-/jobs/2552969 now. > > > Thanks Ben. Seems to work now. Can you please also update the qt69 image? > That has now also been rebuilt. > > > -- > > Alexander > > Cheers, Ben
