On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:02 PM Alexander Semke <alexander.se...@web.de> wrote:
> On 12/02/25 00:41, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > Please work on fixing them, otherwise i will remove the failing CI jobs > on > > their 4th failing week, it is very important that CI is passing for > multiple > > reasons. > > > > Good news: 1 repository was fixed > > > > Bad news: 1 repository started failing, 1 is still failing > > > > > > cantor - 3rd week - LAST WEEK BEFORE TEST REMOVAL > > * https://invent.kde.org/education/cantor/-/pipelines/884127 > > * testmaxima fails > > I'm looking into this problem now. It's working locally without any > problems and there were no code changes in in Cantor's repository in the > last weeks. > > > On CI maxima fails to start with| > | > > |fatal error encountered in SBCL pid 5186 tid 5186:\ncore was built for > runtime \"hostname-id-1735813044\" but this is \"hostname-id-1736350757\"| > > | > | > > This seems to be a build issue in Tumbleweed. > > > Ben, was a new image created three weeks ago which can explain why these > tests started to fail? I assume this problem is already fixed in > Tumbleweed. Any chance to pull the new versions of maxima and > maxima-exec-sbcl? > The SUSE image was re-generated a week ago - see https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-images/-/jobs (Finished tab, then search for the image you are looking for) Comparing vs. the latest build logs for Maxima on the OBS ( https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/openSUSE:Factory/maxima -> https://build.opensuse.org/package/live_build_log/openSUSE:Factory/maxima/standard/x86_64 ) it looks like there has been a version bump. I've triggered https://invent.kde.org/sysadmin/ci-images/-/jobs/2552969 now. > > > -- > > Alexander > > Cheers, Ben
