Am 18.08.23 um 21:41 schrieb Ben Cooksley:
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:17 PM Scarlett Moore <scarlett.gately.mo...@gmail.com> wrote:On Fri, Aug 18, 2023, 12:55 AM Ben Cooksley <bcooks...@kde.org> wrote: On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 3:53 AM Scarlett Moore <scarlett.gately.mo...@gmail.com> wrote: Hello everyone, Hey Scarlett, I am asking to revisit per project repo snapcraft files. I see now that flatpak files are in project repos but I understand this was rejected for snapcraft. I would like to re-propose the idea, and here is why. The CI jobs for snap builds is cludgy at best. We have huge amounts of failures because we must do a public upload to launchpad which places us at the lowest priority and we have many timeouts etc. Their solution is to create proper snap recipes pointing to our repos with the snapcraft.yaml. Our current setup won't work because we use subdirectories in one repo. Thoughts? My understanding (when automating the triggering of these builds on invent.kde.org <http://invent.kde.org> was discussed with Sysadmin) was that the Snap folks had wanted to have everything in one repository. I had queried at the time why we weren't adding a file into each repository (which is what we do with Flatpak, and now with Craft as well - although those builds have yet to be widely rolled out) With regards to the triggering of these builds, how will this happen? It sounds like what you are describing here will result in Canonical servers polling invent.kde.org <http://invent.kde.org> for changes, which is something we're not huge fans of as most projects only change every couple of days. Thanks for your time, Scarlett Cheers, Ben Hi! Thanks all for responding. Albert: snapcraft files have been ironed out. I have been quite busy over the last year doing so. Ben: There is an option to have launchpad build on changes which would have polling. However, I would opt out of this feature and instead write some tooling using launchpad API and Neons watcher tooling to update versions and trigger launchpad builds. It would actually lighten the load on KDE servers significantly. Yes, we would definitely want to opt out of that completely - due to the number of repositories we have, any kind of polling quickly turns into a fairly significant number of requests. Wouldn't you want to trigger this from a .gitlab-ci.yml job definition though like we do for Flatpak and will be doing very soon for all of the Craft builds that support Android, Windows and Linux appimage binaries?
I was about to ask how the "future binary-factory" on invent will look like and suggest to follow that precedent. Can you elaborate on that? Will these be jobs in the relevant repos or will there be a meta-repo with all of the "release" jobs?
