On Wed, 13 May 2020 at 00:19, Carl Schwan <c...@carlschwan.eu> wrote:

> I'm not really happy with how the KDE Apps Monthly Update is happening. I
> understand why we moved away from the KDE Applications brand and
> announcement but the current monthly update doesn't feel better, at least
> from a reader perpective.
>

Thanks for the feedback.  It's hard to judge how well the Monthly App
Updates work as a concept and they do serve a number of purposes that sort
of align but also don't always feel that they do.

- Announcing the release service releases
- Reviewing what new app releases are made in KDE each month
- Promoting KDE's apps as being available through means other than just
Linux distros

Announcing the release service releases is what makes it shift date each
month.  We could separate them but then would the release service
announcements go back to being a product which is what the intention is to
avoid.  What's strange about the decision to debrand it from being a
product into just a service with lots of products is one anyone feels too
strongly about rather than just being one that nobody objects to.  My
preference was always to rebrand it as KDE Apps Bundle or similar but that
had objections and with KDE decision making is often taken as the option
that nobody objects to.  If you want to re-open the debate you'd need to
work out how to come to a new consensus.

Picking which apps to review is each so we don't include too many bugfix
only releases is just something we can keep in mind in future ones, that
makes sense.

I'm keen to highlight new package distribution methods, that's a primary
aim of the All About the Apps Goal and this month that happens to be
AppImages but other months it's Chocolately or Snaps or whatever.

Jonathan

Reply via email to