On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:38 AM, Weng Xuetian <wen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Alex Fiestas <afies...@kde.org> wrote:
>> Hey there to everyone!
>>
>> Months ago we started to port all plasmoids to QML, we have come a long way
>> and now it seems we are getting close to finish the huge task.
>>
>> During this short period of time, a lot of people have worked on QML: GSoC,
>> sporadic developers, etc. Because of that we have a little bit of mess in
>> terms of what's done, what have to be finished, who is working on what, etc.
>>
>> To solve this, we have created/improved a wikipage with a nice table where we
>> can list all Plasmoids and Containers that need porting, as well of the 
>> status
>> and who is working on it.
>>
>> It is important that we keep this table up to date so we can coordinate 
>> better
>> the effort between everybody willing to work on it.
>>
>> This is the site:
>> http://community.kde.org/Plasma/QMLPorting
>>
>> We have moved old bits of information to it, so even though the table is 
>> quite
>> full of information it is surelly outdated.
>>
>> Everybody is invited to take a look at the page, and updated it if there is
>> some information missing or incorrect.
>> besides being able to better coordinate, we can have the point of the
>> situation and see what plasmoids is realistic to push for inclusion in 4.10.
>>
>> Cheerz !
>>
>>>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe 
>>>> <<
>
> I'm currently maintaining a plasmoid which is hard to port to qml (due
> to qml limitation), I have tried several month ago but finally gave
> up..
> Any advice for my situation? Implement a qml wrapper for my c++
> widget? Or leave it there?

I would suggest you tell us what Plasmoid it is,and what the QML
limitations you are facing are and let us help you.

Making a QDeclarativeItem (which is sort of a "qml wrapper for C++",
but I wouldn't use those words) for a widget in many situations is a
perfectly sensible way to go.

>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<

Reply via email to