On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Alex Fiestas <afies...@kde.org> wrote: > Hey there to everyone! > > Months ago we started to port all plasmoids to QML, we have come a long way > and now it seems we are getting close to finish the huge task. > > During this short period of time, a lot of people have worked on QML: GSoC, > sporadic developers, etc. Because of that we have a little bit of mess in > terms of what's done, what have to be finished, who is working on what, etc. > > To solve this, we have created/improved a wikipage with a nice table where we > can list all Plasmoids and Containers that need porting, as well of the status > and who is working on it. > > It is important that we keep this table up to date so we can coordinate better > the effort between everybody willing to work on it. > > This is the site: > http://community.kde.org/Plasma/QMLPorting > > We have moved old bits of information to it, so even though the table is quite > full of information it is surelly outdated. > > Everybody is invited to take a look at the page, and updated it if there is > some information missing or incorrect. > besides being able to better coordinate, we can have the point of the > situation and see what plasmoids is realistic to push for inclusion in 4.10. > > Cheerz ! > >>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
I'm currently maintaining a plasmoid which is hard to port to qml (due to qml limitation), I have tried several month ago but finally gave up.. Any advice for my situation? Implement a qml wrapper for my c++ widget? Or leave it there? >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
