Right after you point to the ones that contra-indicate it. On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 7:57 AM, Christophe Giboudeaux <[email protected]>wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 May 2011 09:00:10 Hugo Pereira Da Costa wrote: > > Hi, > > [...] > > > > Some of the reasons justifying the feature have actually already been > > discussed in this thread (by Martin), but must have been lost in > > translations: > > > > - it fits perfectly within oxygen, which makes no distinction between > > window decoration and window content (and does so since day one) > > - it gives a use to the many empty areas kde applications have > > - it improves user experience (thinks the designer and I agree with him) > > - it is far more discoverable that the Alt+drag feature > > > > The reasons why it is superior than the Alt+drag feature > > - you don't need to press Alt (sorry to state the obvious) > > - it only works on *empty areas* whereas Alt works everywhere (that does > > not actually make it superior, just different) > > - it is far more discoverable that the Alt+drag feature > > - it improves user experience > > > > [...] > > > > > Please provide numbers (or at least application names) to back-up your > > statement. > > I can easily cite 26 applications which I use dayly and with which there > > is no issue. > > > > Can you provide the user survey results or even better, the link to the > kde- > usability discussion about this major behaviour change, please ? > > > Christophe > > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to > unsubscribe << > >
>> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to unsubscribe <<
