In data domenica 20 novembre 2016 13:24:50 CET, Elvis Angelaccio ha scritto: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Boudhayan Gupta <bgu...@kde.org> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I seem to have missed this discussion and since there's a ticket to > > move this I've become aware of this now, and am asking here. > > > > If we *are* to move to extragear, Extragear/network is the more > > appropriate location for this. Reasons: > > > > 1) GDrive is not PIM related - it is networked file storage. > > > > 2) It depends on a Google Account, sure, but that account does not > > need to have GMail enabled on it. It need have nothing else enabled on > > it but Google Drive. > > > > 3) If I'm browsing the archives, I'm never going to think looking into > > PIM for a Google Drive client. I *will* look at network though. > > > > Inputs? > > I think both locations would be fine (and in fact, it used to live in > playground/network). I proposed to move it to PIM because it depends > on libkgapi which is a PIM library. This would avoid a "cross-module" > dependency, but perhaps this is not an issue?
IMHO it is not an issue. Extragear means "something with its own release schedule", so it does not really matter. I see it too closer to network than pim. > Though imho the ideal > solution would be making libkgapi a framework (but requires someone > willing to do the work). That's up to Dan, but I don't think it would prevent kio-gdrive from being moved (or kept in) to network Ciao -- Luigi
