2014-04-15 22:27 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org>: > El Dilluns, 14 d'abril de 2014, a les 11:35:02, Elvis Angelaccio va > escriure: > > 2014-04-14 1:06 GMT+02:00 Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org>: > > > * Your choice of splitters to separate hours/minutes/seconds seems a > bit > > > > > > weird do you think that anyone will use it to have something like very > > > wide > > > minutes and narrow the rest? > > > > I see your point, probably the splitters are unnecessary UI components > for > > this use case. > > What do you think about an option in "Interface settings"? I could > display > > by default a single QFrame (without splitters) and leave to the user an > > opt-in to allow the splitters. > > In this way I can reuse the existing code without too much refactoring. > > I just don't see the need for the splitters, why would someone want to have > them? > > To be honest there are no real motivations, I just thought that a splitter could be a further feature. But indeed it's useless, at least if not used for a particular use case (see Thomas suggestions).
I've just pushed a <test> branch without splitters, for a quick feedback look here: http://abload.de/img/kronometer-no-splittevdklc.png If you want instead a "single display" without the dividers between hours/minutes/etc, then I can push another experimental branch <test2>. Something like this older version: http://abload.de/img/kronometer-running-la6ddg3.png But since now kronometer has those "header" labels above the numbers, I would need a tabular layout and from my earlier tests I remember that it looks ugly. > Cheers, > Albert > Regards, Elvis
