https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485332
--- Comment #7 from caulier.gil...@gmail.com --- >Now that we are at Qt-6.7.0 with the Windows MSVC version, do we want to go >back to a local date/time in digiKam or do we want to keep >UTC as the >timespec? yes, when 6.7.0 will be available >One would probably be the speed of date calculations, we can easily test this >with a change in digikam_globals.cpp without patching the >entire code. yes, a factorized method checking the QT version will help here. >The question is also, if we were to support time zones in the future, would >UTC be better as a timespec? I think yes. a C++20 response is given here : https://www.modernescpp.com/index.php/calendar-and-time-zone-in-c-20-time-zones/ Gilles -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
