https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=485332
Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |metzping...@gmail.com
--- Comment #2 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> ---
The problem is clear and easy to fix.
@Gilles,
Now that we are at Qt-6.7.0 with the Windows MSVC version, do we want to go
back to a local date/time in digiKam or do we want to keep UTC as the timespec?
One would probably be the speed of date calculations, we can easily test this
with a change in digikam_globals.cpp without patching the entire code.
The question is also, if we were to support time zones in the future, would UTC
be better as a timespec?
Maik
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
