https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=453351
--- Comment #3 from Jack <ostrof...@users.sourceforge.net> --- I'm curious what type of number you use that really applies to both (or more?) splits of a transaction. If it's a valid use case, I can change this to a WISHLIST, so the request doesn't get lost. If using the memo field works OK for you, I can close as INTENTIONAL, meaning it's working as designed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
