https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447745
--- Comment #4 from hong <hong7...@gmail.com> --- got you. thanks a lot for your explanation! come to think of it, i believe in the old windows days, browser saved it as .mhtml and when the file was deleted (i guess with 'file explorer'), all disappeared. On 1/1/22 13:03, argonel wrote: > https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=447745 > > argonel<argo...@gmail.com> changed: > > What |Removed |Added > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Status|REPORTED |RESOLVED > Resolution|--- |DOWNSTREAM > > --- Comment #3 from argonel<argo...@gmail.com> --- > (In reply to hong from comment #2) >> Created attachment 145008 [details] >> attachment-19124-0.html >> >> yes, for web developers perhaps, >> but not for the general public. >> ok, if not a bug, can it be a feature request? > The feature request would need to be for the browser that saved the page as an > html file and an adjacent folder. It could create a folder and save the items > within, or it could save the page as a single file. > > There is no reliable way for Dolphin to know that the folder and the html file > are associated. The only way to do this in Dolphin would be to employ a > heuristic that needs to be kept in sync with the browser that saved the page. > If the developers of that browser change their minds about how page saving > works, Dolphin would need to support both the "old" way(s) and the "new" way. > Each browser uses its own convention for saving pages, and thus Dolphin would > need a heuristic for each of them. This is not sustainable. > -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
