https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=432387
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Arnez <ar...@linux.ibm.com> --- (In reply to Julian Seward from comment #5) > So .. am a bit unclear about this, but it doesn't matter. It's enough to > say that it should be impossible to cause the front end to assert by feeding > it invalid instructions. Instead, all invalid insns should cause a SIGILL > to be handed to the guest (or whatever is appropriate on s390). So long > as the above holds, then I'm happy. Right, this type of decode failure results in a SIGILL to be synthesized, just like with other decode failures. So I think this addresses your concern. I'll apply the patch series then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
