https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435120
Rainer Klute <rainer.kl...@gmx.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #22 from Rainer Klute <rainer.kl...@gmx.de> ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #21)
> You brought the GDPR up, and now you're complaining we're talking about it?
Oh no, I don’t mind discussing the GDPR, but I don’t see any point in
challenging its principles. Theses principles are as they are, and there is no
point in inventing your own interpretations that deviate from the established
legal practice.
> There is no sensitive data recorded, the name is optional and the date can
> be faked just moving the clock on your system if you fillthat having a
> timestamp is somehow "sensitive".
By the way, we are not just talking about “sensitive” data, which requires
specific protection according to recital 51 of the GDPR, but about personal
data in general. The name of the user is no question personal. And adjusting
the time of the system - are you really serious? Even in cases where the user
is also the admin, this is not likely to be an practical option.
I also don't understand why you are resisting tooth and nail to consider the
extensions I suggested. What is your motivation? Would it be that difficult to
implement?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
