https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=404286
--- Comment #20 from Michał Dybczak <michal.dybc...@gmail.com> --- Yes, this is a social problem but git system would allow more people be involved and that would create a healthier atmosphere. Currently, active lang devs feel unsupported and alone. They also know how much work they put in it, so they know all ins and outs, plus they have a formal education in language area so no one is better to make the decisions then them so if they make a call, we can discuss all we want. This is still a social problem and in general unhealthy and dangerous situation. >From one side the experience and knowledge puts them in position to make decision, on other hand, language is a bit more than an academic knowledge, it's also a history of usage and currently the reverse is supporting the widely accepted and used translation "Anuluj" no matter of linguistic correctness. The main issue here is, since Linux in desktop is still a small niche, we should abide the wide used standards to ease the transition from Windows. There are areas where we cannot or even shouldn't use Windows solutions, but language standards are not one of them. They won't create security wholes. Translation in UI area should follow computer language that is familiar and widely used. Confusion and lack of standard here is not good to anyone. This is what current PL lang devs aren't getting. They have their own reasons and there is no discussion. I don't know what is this Community Working Group decision and who is involved there? Is the discussion open? Can we join it? How it all works? Do they really can change the translation if the only persons capable of doing it are the devs that made that unfortunate decision in the first place? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
