https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=413127
--- Comment #12 from Michail Vourlakos <mvourla...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to andydecleyre from comment #11) > OK I don't understand the intended purpose of the lock button, but surely > the behavior reiterated in Comment 8 Question 4 is not intended, right? What > could possibly be the point of that? > > And can you please answer Question 5 (Comment 9)? You changed the title to > point out that it's possible to have parabolic effect disabled, hover-zoom > at 0%, and "unlock state," whatever that means, but I don't see how that's > possible, if parabolic effect is controlled by the lock button. Comment 7 is the best explanation I can give. For any more questions feel free to investigate the code and provide patches for future versions. The thing is that the implementation is doing exactly what I am thinking as the best approach so this is not a bug. For anyone interested to contribute and improve things, no problem from me. The code in question can be investigated at file, https://github.com/KDE/latte-dock/blob/master/containment/package/contents/ui/applet/AppletItem.qml -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.