https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406855
--- Comment #12 from Maik Qualmann <metzping...@gmail.com> --- To support the variant without a year I do not see as meaningful. This should definitely remain an automatic function. I have a long list of test files, where you already think about which date is hidden behind it and yet the function recognizes the date correctly. You will certainly find a combination that is detected incorrectly. ((:-)) Maik -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
