https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=392251
--- Comment #18 from ocumo <kxk-ocumoatbugs...@lugosys.com> --- Created attachment 115736 --> https://bugs.kde.org/attachment.cgi?id=115736&action=edit Installed libx11 related packages Ok, it seems that we need to understand whether the appimage is somehow built with an obsolete/inadequate library, or my system somehow has an inadequate/obsolete or somehow conflicting library. One thing that should be taken into consideration is that whatever you do to build the kritalime PPA version, is done OK and no one, including me, has complaints like this one about the hardware or system I am using with krita. What I can do is to analyse my system as thoroughly as needed to help reducing the scope of this investigation. I can't help with how the appimage is made, though. I can offer for starters, (please see the attached file), a list of all `libx11*` packages installed in my system; it's just the output of the command: `apt list libx11* --all-versions`. On top of that, the following information is relevant: All the installed packages come from the official ubuntu repos, either the bionic-updates or bionic sections. There are neither PPA versions nor manually compiled libraries, these or any others, as I am very careful with global systems files. If I ever have to compile anything, it's never a library or any kind of system files or files that somehow could have global scope. I actually almost never compile stuff and if I must, I would always do it in an isolated scope. Even Python programs that are not official are always enclosed in their specific environment. I know well how bad can it be to troubleshoot incompatible/conflicting dependencies. As for PPAs, I only risk those coming from serious projects, such as Krita. That being said, my interest is not to exclude my system out of the investigation. I certainly may have something bad in it, made some mistake or forgotten something. So, please if you could suggest more checks or system information that could help to simplify the troubleshooting, by all means, do. Important: is there a chance that someone from the appimage building team might also contribute their 5 cents? I also must remind the readers, because it's a long thread, that up to Krita 3.3.3, ALL those appimages work without any issue with my Wacom Cintiq device, even today! All the troubles started with the appimages of the Krita v4.x.x branch, all its versions. Apart from the Krita code: what else changed there? I am not yet convinced (though possible) that this is some kind of unique problem with my system, which is build on official Ubuntu packages on normal hardware. Finally: I don't like Flatpak, or Snaps: they are, by all comparisons I have been able to read online, quite inferior, by many reasons, to appimages. The reason why I would like to work with appimages, is for testing new versions of Krita, otherwise, I would just wait for your kritalime release and forget about it. So far I have seen Flatpak versions only for final releases. I'll try to find some time to test the available Flatpak, if you think that makes sense. Are there Flatpak versions of krita 4.2? In any case, I don't want to quit using appimages, unless Flatpak would work for me and there would be Flatpak versions for the testing Kritas. Thank you! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
