https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=527036
--- Comment #9 from Kabus <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Noah Davis from comment #8) > (In reply to Kabus from comment #6) > > (In reply to Tobias Fella from comment #5) > > > Plwase don't use LLMs to write your comments. > > > > Why not? It's convenient for me because English is not my native language. > > There is a general sentiment that can be summarized like this: > If you aren't willing to write something yourself, don't expect others to be > willing to read it. > > I would suggest using a more direct translation service like Google > Translate or something similar. Depending on your perspective, it might feel > like a pointless difference because you're not really writing the English > yourself. However, a more direct translation service is more likely to match > your own writing style and say what you've really written. We prefer more > direct methods of communication because LLMs can hallucinate information. > People can misunderstand and miscommunicate too, but we'd rather talk to a > person instead of a "meat proxy" (https://meatproxy.me/). > > Discouraging LLM generated messages is also a way to filter out people who > aren't willing to put any effort into communication. When you have to talk > to many people and everyone is able to send long messages without using > their brains, it can be exhausting. It makes us want to automatically ignore > anyone who writes a message that looks like it was generated by a chat based > LLM. I understand the concern, but this is a technical bug report, not a personal discussion. I experienced the issue and provided the technical details myself; I use AI to communicate them clearly in English, which is not my native language. The focus should be on the accuracy and usefulness of the report, not the tool used to write it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
