https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525919

--- Comment #14 from [email protected] ---
(In reply to Norbert Harrer from comment #13)
> (In reply to yhl3051 from comment #12)
> > To begin with, I did choose the dropdown, chosen before pressing Update.
> > Same procedure as the failing runs.
> > 
> > Nothing relevant changed here however. Current versions, same as when it was
> > failing:
> > 
> >   plasma-discover-6.7.5-1.fc44
> >   plasma-discover-flatpak-6.7.5-1.fc44
> >   plasma-workspace-6.7.5-1.fc44
> >   kwin-6.7.5-1.fc44
> >   PackageKit-1.4.0-1.fc44
> >   fwupd-2.1.8-1.fc44
> > 
> > The journal shows 20 consecutive Discover-triggered failures from Sep 18 to
> > Oct 14 08:47 EDT, then the one success at about 10:53 EDT. So the success
> > has a cause I could not identify. It may be timing, or some state difference
> > I did not capture, rather than a fix.
> > 
> > Differences I could find for the successful run:
> > - Only 3 RPM updates, all third-party (google-chrome-stable,
> > google-chrome-canary, chatgpt), no Flatpak or firmware entries.
> > - That Discover instance was launched from a terminal with
> > QT_LOGGING_RULES="*discover*=true" (I was debugging another bug), which may
> > change timing slightly.
> > 
> > I checked whether Flatpak updates in the same run correlate with the
> > failure: only 3 of the 20 failing runs had any, so they are not the trigger.
> > 
> > At my next update I will capture the session bus with the same busctl
> > command you used and report the logoutAndReboot count.
> > 
> > The log analysis was done with AI assistance; the data is from my own 
> > system.
> 
> Thanks for checking. I tried to reproduce the conditions of your
> successful run: a single RPM update (plasma-workspace-wallpapers,
> downgraded to 6.6.4 beforehand and removed from the PackageKit cache so
> it had to be downloaded again), no Flatpak updates pending, and Discover
> started from a terminal with QT_LOGGING_RULES="*discover*=true".
> It still failed here, as did two earlier runs today (one without the
> logging rule, one with a Flatpak update in the same run).
> 
> The session-bus capture of that run shows the same pattern as in
> comment #4: two logoutAndReboot calls from Discover with consecutive
> serials, this time 754 ms apart, followed by the rejected second
> closeWaylandWindows and resetLogout.
> 
> Like you said, it might be down to timing. I'm curious what your capture
> shows at the next update, and whether it keeps working for you.

Just tried again, it did not restart.  This was a one-time occurence, it seems.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to