https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=452924
--- Comment #39 from flan_suse <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Matt from comment #28) > It seems this could be resolved upstream by allowing the user to choose which > remote filesystems are designated as "slow". This needs more attention. Arbitrarily designating network shares as "slow" has been a source of frustration and *multiple* QoL bugs on KDE. This isn't 2010 anymore. People have gigabit, 2.5GbE, and 10GbE local networks. People have NAS servers. SMB has improved its performance years ago. NFS is very fast today. SMB and NFS support server-side copying and can leverage reflinks, which Dolphin sadly doesn't take advantage of (but other file browsers do.) People use SMB and NFS as their main storage and workload. I would argue that an external USB is "slower" than an NFS mount on a fast local network, but according to KDE the portable USB drive is somehow the "faster" filesystem. The KDE devs need to rethink this paradigm. It's causing recurrent QoL issues and frustrations to the end-users. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
