https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=375703
Wolfgang Scheffner <wscheffn...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |wscheffn...@gmail.com
--- Comment #16 from Wolfgang Scheffner <wscheffn...@gmail.com> ---
Mario,
I agree to 1) and 2): Moving a group or a single items should preserve the
group relation.
With 3) I don't quite understand the remark at the very end of your comment:
> 3) do nothing (default)
However, I agree to
> 3) Copying a group within digiKam should also copy the grouping relation for
> the newly generated items
but of course it should be a completly new group independent of the original.
4) Here I would vote for not establishing relations to the original group. We
could in addition implement an option to keep the copy in the group but I don't
like the idea of too many options/settings.
5) I would (as a user) never expect anything to be grouped automatically at
import. I why should we group identical images anyway? That's what Find
Duplicates is for. And here applies the same as under 4): I don't like the idea
...
6) I agree absolutely.
Other than that I am of the opinion that improving metadata handling is the
most important issue in digiKam.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
