https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=459115

john.lipt...@proton.me changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |john.lipt...@proton.me

--- Comment #11 from john.lipt...@proton.me ---
I agree with Nate on this one, the current sorting method is fine.

Sorting alphabetically would only mean you end up scrolling down the list to
find the packages that are currently being updated anyway, negating the point
of sorting alphabetically.

Plus, when you open Discover and are greeted with a list of
applications/packages that have pending updates, are you not reading the list
*before* clicking update all? Why exactly do you need to find package XYZ
*after* you've started the process? Surely you already know what's being
updated?

Ideally, you should scan through the list and uncheck any applications/packages
you do not want updating before clicking update all. So I'm not really sure
what benefit it brings to end users to see applications ordered alphabetically.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.

Reply via email to