https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=499733
--- Comment #2 from Jakob Petsovits <jpe...@petsovits.com> --- (In reply to Zamundaaa from comment #1) > Sigh, panel power savings was supposed to be a drm property again, and not > stay something another process controls through a backdoor :/ > I don't think we should bother with it until that changes, and until we can > do anything about it without having to drag dbus into the output > configuration system... My naive reading is that it's still a DRM property: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/upower/power-profiles-daemon/-/blob/c47fea05d439a69c6a53d4c4e02c56bd8ca51200/src/ppd-action-amdgpu-panel-power.c#L291 As long as p-p-d doesn't mess with it, I guess there's no problem with you accessing it directly as opposed to letting p-p-d do it. > > Adjust GPU dynamic power management > I think that's something we could put into the power management settings > though. Afaiu it just makes the power saving mode more aggressive on the > GPU, that should be relatively straight forward, UX wise. Yeah, that's worth considering. One hiccup for UX is that p-p-d applies this option (and others) based on its "power-saver" profile being active, rather than the AC / Battery / Low Battery / Critical Battery split that we use in Power Management settings. On a tangential note, I also noticed that the "trickle_charge" action is enabled by default and is going to mess with my efforts to get custom charge thresholds working for Dell laptops (https://invent.kde.org/plasma/powerdevil/-/merge_requests/510). Also sigh. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching all bug changes.
