On 8/Nov/19 18:39, Clarke Morledge wrote:
> > > So, if you do not need a lot of speeds and feeds, and can live without > a physical backup RE, the MX204 would be a good alternative to a MX240. Our use-case for the MX204 is: - 10Gbps capability in the Metro. Hardware redundancy not necessary, as revenues don't justify it. - Peering and transit routers. Multiple entry/exit points, so hardware redundancy is not necessary. Our use-case for the MX480 (MX204 is too small): - High-touch edge services for customers. Mark. _______________________________________________ juniper-nsp mailing list [email protected] https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/juniper-nsp
