On 11.04.2012 02:45, Stefan Steiniger wrote: > as this goes to my svn folder I remove parts of the header. > > I am actually not sure if we should use the SVN list for exchanging > emails? but that's a decision of you - the "active developers". > >> for all icons related to the same plugin (agree it would be better) >> maybe icons can be resized, depending on where they are. >> We did that recently for "new project" and "open" icons in the main menu. >> Resized image are not as neat as the source image, but at least, >> alignments are preserved >> which, in my opinion, is the rule n° 1 if we want a UI which looks serious. > > yes - I agree with Michael: Icons in the toolbars need to have same size. > I once changed the whole GUI to famfamfam icons (took me 2 days) - but > then discarded all my changes as some icons where not available (to GIS > specific) and also the set had a different size & style. > > It's either all or nothing with respect to icons - from my point. > Hence, re-sizing would be necessary. >
this dynamic resizing is an ugly matter. let me see if we can add a limited multiresolution icon support to icon. maybe adding a MultiIcon Interface which defines a getIcon(Dimension Method) this way signalling what size is it intended for. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Better than sec? Nothing is better than sec when it comes to monitoring Big Data applications. Try Boundary one-second resolution app monitoring today. Free. http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
