On 06.02.2011 05:57, Mohammed Rashad wrote: > > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 10:28 PM, <edgar.sol...@web.de > <mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> wrote: > > Michael, you are totally right. I agree that all efforts are welcome. > Just the part where everything is migrated to a platform located in india and > with with no possibility for you or stephan to intervene, like on a neutral > platform as sf.net <http://sf.net> or google code, makes me uncomfortable. > > > what you mean by "no possibility for you or stephan to intervene"
Currently they are the administrators of all openjump aspects. Moving a big part of openjump over to your facilities would mean they effectively loose this control. In the worst case we'd have to revert the merge and reapply all the changes inbetween. It's mainly a matter of trust in you and your company. The trust is build over time and by exchange. I'd rather see you and your team contributing some more on the existing platforms first. Can you tell us some more about your institution? Can your team members subscribe to the mailing list and introduce themselves? Also there is still the point of reliability of web services (access from europe, usa, australia, where the majority of oj devs are located). This just my point of view. I am just a careful fellow and can't speak for the majority of oj people. ..ede ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these rules translate into the virtual world? http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
