Michael, you are totally right. I agree that all efforts are welcome. Just the 
part where everything is migrated to a platform located in india and with with 
no possibility for you or stephan to intervene, like on a neutral platform as 
sf.net or google code, makes me uncomfortable.

ede

On 04.02.2011 23:10, Michaël Michaud wrote:
> Hi Mohammed,
> 
> I'm very happy to learn you and other developpers from India are planning to 
> improve OpenJUMP, develop plugins and make OpenJUMP be a member of OSGeo.
> 
> I gave you commit rights to the svn.
> - you can use the pgRoutingPlugin directory as you want
> - you can create new plugin directories
> - for modifications to the core, please, explain your ideas on the list before
> - for bug fixing, please, go ahead ;-)
> 
> About your idea of a new website, I noticed a few comments against 
> sourceforge, and even more comments against a change to trac.
> As I told you, my own position is not related to management tools pros and 
> cons, but to human resources.
> 
> If you're sure your team is strong enough to migrate the project, improve 
> OpenJUMP and do all what you say, go ahead. I think most of OpenJUMP 
> developpers will be happy to join you soon.
> 
> The other way (the one I recommend) is to contribute to sourceforge project 
> first, to show us what you can do by adding some great plugins, bug fixes or 
> improvments, then to submit a vote again...
> 
> Michaël
> 
> 
> Le 04/02/2011 11:00, Mohammed Rashad a écrit :
>> I will do the job of copying everything to server. the website will be 
>> openjump.org <http://openjump.org>. server is located at IIIT-H 
>> lsi.iiit.ac.in <http://lsi.iiit.ac.in> (Lab for spatial Informatics)
>> I am thinking as a volunteer for website management for OpenJUMP
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 3:25 PM, <edgar.sol...@web.de 
>> <mailto:edgar.sol...@web.de>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 04.02.2011 07:19, Mohammed Rashad wrote:
>>     >
>>     > see this
>>     > http://trac.osgeo.org/grass
>>     > i think its better to use trac than sourceforge. now sourceforge fits 
>> your needs for now but it is better to have trac
>>     > you just view the sites with trac and you will know.
>>
>>     currently a lot of information is in the mediawiki. while i see that 
>> this information should be provided more prominently i don't see the need to 
>> move everything in one place. btw. where would this server be located?
>>
>>     > Anyway if most of developers doesnt need the trac interface. no 
>> problem for us. It depends of voting of all developers. we can also have 
>> trac with openjump whole site on our server. If majority of developers vote 
>> +1. we can have everything of openjump under one umbrella
>>     > www.openjump.org <http://www.openjump.org> <http://www.openjump.org>
>>     > www.openjump.org/trac <http://www.openjump.org/trac> 
>> <http://www.openjump.org/trac>
>>
>>     you could however start a trac for your plugin-repository. if you need 
>> changes in the core components, these are suggested and discussed on the 
>> mailing list.
>>
>>     we happily link your trac on either oj.org <http://oj.org> and oj wiki. 
>> when you start contributing continuously we should see how the collaboration 
>> works out and where there are needs for improvement.
>>
>>     ..ede
>>
>>     
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>     The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
>>     and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical 
>> server's
>>     connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
>>     rules translate into the virtual world?
>>     http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>     Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Rashad
>>   
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
>> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
>> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
>> rules translate into the virtual world? 
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
>>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net 
>> <mailto:Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
> and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
> connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
> rules translate into the virtual world? 
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The modern datacenter depends on network connectivity to access resources
and provide services. The best practices for maximizing a physical server's
connectivity to a physical network are well understood - see how these
rules translate into the virtual world? 
http://p.sf.net/sfu/oracle-sfdevnlfb
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to