btw. some thing I did not really understand: why do you want to do monthly releases? because we have already a nightly build which get done automatically as soon changes appear (if i remember correctly) - though - it may be that these changes have to be in the trunk.
stefan Sunburned Surveyor wrote: > Thanks for your permission Stefan. I'll wait for Larry to respond. If > he gives me the OK after reading my response to his questions I will > create the branch. > > The Sunburned Surveyor > > On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Stefan Steiniger <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hei Landon, >> >> Yep - no problem to create a new branch. You should be able to do that. >> However, I tried branching once lately, and messed-up my local system, >> i.e. I wasn't able to re-integrate (merge) my changes to the branch back >> without copy pasting to another folder and then do a complete new check-out. >> >> hope you have more luck >> stefan >> >> Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >>> Michael, >>> >>> You wrote: "I forgot bug (1) reported by Nacho as it has never been >>> reported in the >>> bug tracker. I can have a look this week end as I think I wrote the >>> guilty plugin, >>> and Nacho kindly supplied the data to reproduce the problem." >>> >>> Thanks for offering to help with Nacho's bug. I think the first step >>> would be modifying the code to report the FID of the problem feature >>> in the exception message. At least, that is what I was going to try. >>> You might have a short cut to the problem. >>> >>> You wrote: "There is another bug for which I spent some time without >>> success : >>> 2792806 Error while deleting heterogeneous item >>> If you or someone else wants to have a look, it needs a good >>> understanding of the item selection process (which is quite complex in >>> OpenJUMP due to partial feature slection capability)" >>> >>> I've done a little work with the SelectionManager in my super select >>> plug-in. I'll add this to my list of things to fix if I can. I'm just >>> waiting for Stefan's permission to get a branch to work in. I'll copy >>> him direction on this e-mail since I know he sometimes travels and >>> looses track of the messages on this list. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> The Sunburned Surveyor >>> >>> >>> 2010/4/8 Michaël Michaud <[email protected]>: >>>> Hi Sunburned Surveyor >>>> >>>> Fixing these bugs would be nice and starting unit tests would be nice too. >>>> >>>> I forgot bug (1) reported by Nacho as it has never been reported in the >>>> bug tracker. >>>> I can have a look this week end as I think I wrote the guilty plugin, >>>> and Nacho kindly supplied the data to reproduce the problem. >>>> >>>> There is another bug for which I spent some time without success : >>>> 2792806 Error while deleting heterogeneous item >>>> If you or someone else wants to have a look, it needs a good >>>> understanding of the item selection process (which is quite complex in >>>> OpenJUMP due to partial feature slection capability) >>>> >>>> Michaël >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sunburned Surveyor a écrit : >>>>> I'd like to request permission to create a branch in the JPP SVN where >>>>> I can start work on two tasks: >>>>> >>>>> - A series of bug fixes and minor improvements. These fixes include >>>>> (1) reporting the FID in the Union By Attribute plug-in to address a >>>>> problem reported some time ago by Nacho; (2) making the cut polygon >>>>> tool obey the "editable" status of the layer that contains the polygon >>>>> being cut; and (3) consolidation of some utility code. >>>>> >>>>> - Creation of a set of units tests to start testing the OpenJUMP core. >>>>> I'll probably start with classes in the >>>>> com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.model packages, since those are the >>>>> simplest. >>>>> >>>>> I would like to move these improvements to the trunk of the SVN, one >>>>> at a time, after getting approval from the other programmers on this >>>>> mailing list. I won't be proposing any major changes to the core, and >>>>> will make sure I get buy off from everyone before commiting to the >>>>> trunk. >>>>> >>>>> With Stefan's permission I'd like to start packaging monthly builds of >>>>> this branch in between his major OpenJUMP releases. >>>>> >>>>> Any comments or strong objections? >>>>> >>>>> The Sunburned Surveyor >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>> >>> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
