Thanks for your permission Stefan. I'll wait for Larry to respond. If he gives me the OK after reading my response to his questions I will create the branch.
The Sunburned Surveyor On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Stefan Steiniger <[email protected]> wrote: > Hei Landon, > > Yep - no problem to create a new branch. You should be able to do that. > However, I tried branching once lately, and messed-up my local system, > i.e. I wasn't able to re-integrate (merge) my changes to the branch back > without copy pasting to another folder and then do a complete new check-out. > > hope you have more luck > stefan > > Sunburned Surveyor wrote: >> Michael, >> >> You wrote: "I forgot bug (1) reported by Nacho as it has never been >> reported in the >> bug tracker. I can have a look this week end as I think I wrote the >> guilty plugin, >> and Nacho kindly supplied the data to reproduce the problem." >> >> Thanks for offering to help with Nacho's bug. I think the first step >> would be modifying the code to report the FID of the problem feature >> in the exception message. At least, that is what I was going to try. >> You might have a short cut to the problem. >> >> You wrote: "There is another bug for which I spent some time without success >> : >> 2792806 Error while deleting heterogeneous item >> If you or someone else wants to have a look, it needs a good >> understanding of the item selection process (which is quite complex in >> OpenJUMP due to partial feature slection capability)" >> >> I've done a little work with the SelectionManager in my super select >> plug-in. I'll add this to my list of things to fix if I can. I'm just >> waiting for Stefan's permission to get a branch to work in. I'll copy >> him direction on this e-mail since I know he sometimes travels and >> looses track of the messages on this list. >> >> Thanks, >> >> The Sunburned Surveyor >> >> >> 2010/4/8 Michaël Michaud <[email protected]>: >>> Hi Sunburned Surveyor >>> >>> Fixing these bugs would be nice and starting unit tests would be nice too. >>> >>> I forgot bug (1) reported by Nacho as it has never been reported in the >>> bug tracker. >>> I can have a look this week end as I think I wrote the guilty plugin, >>> and Nacho kindly supplied the data to reproduce the problem. >>> >>> There is another bug for which I spent some time without success : >>> 2792806 Error while deleting heterogeneous item >>> If you or someone else wants to have a look, it needs a good >>> understanding of the item selection process (which is quite complex in >>> OpenJUMP due to partial feature slection capability) >>> >>> Michaël >>> >>> >>> >>> Sunburned Surveyor a écrit : >>>> I'd like to request permission to create a branch in the JPP SVN where >>>> I can start work on two tasks: >>>> >>>> - A series of bug fixes and minor improvements. These fixes include >>>> (1) reporting the FID in the Union By Attribute plug-in to address a >>>> problem reported some time ago by Nacho; (2) making the cut polygon >>>> tool obey the "editable" status of the layer that contains the polygon >>>> being cut; and (3) consolidation of some utility code. >>>> >>>> - Creation of a set of units tests to start testing the OpenJUMP core. >>>> I'll probably start with classes in the >>>> com.vividsolutions.jump.workbench.model packages, since those are the >>>> simplest. >>>> >>>> I would like to move these improvements to the trunk of the SVN, one >>>> at a time, after getting approval from the other programmers on this >>>> mailing list. I won't be proposing any major changes to the core, and >>>> will make sure I get buy off from everyone before commiting to the >>>> trunk. >>>> >>>> With Stefan's permission I'd like to start packaging monthly builds of >>>> this branch in between his major OpenJUMP releases. >>>> >>>> Any comments or strong objections? >>>> >>>> The Sunburned Surveyor >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >>> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >>> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >>> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >>> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval >> Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs >> proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. >> See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. >> http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel >> >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
