> I also don't think the permission from just Vivid Solutions is
> sufficient. There have been a lot of other people contributing code to
> OJ. Our project doesn't require contributors to transfer copyright or
> the authority to relicense. That means we'd really need to contact all
> of our past contributors for permission to change the license.
>   

This is not true. Because the contributions were for a GPL'd codebase 
and are derived (subclassing, interfacing) from it, they are 
automatically GPL2. Isn't it amazing how virulent this license works :).

> I know people have reacted coldly to the idea of asking for copyright
> on contributions before, but this very issue is one reason to do it.
>   

Again not necessary as the project is already GPL. Of course has every 
author the right to do whatever with his/her own code in parallel, but 
this leads away from the topic.

> Still, GPL V2 has worked fine for us, so I don't think this is a burning 
> issue.
>   

In short there is an overview on
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_General_Public_License#Version_3

I personally favour GPL3, because it advocates free and open software 
more efficiently. But thats just my point of view.

Regards Ede
--
> SS
>
> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Stefan Steiniger <sst...@geo.uzh.ch> wrote:
>   
>> Hei,
>>
>> @Ede: thanks for the comment:
>>
>> so the VividSolution note says:
>>
>>  * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
>>  * modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
>>  * as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
>>  * of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
>>
>> so, we could switch to GPL V3, but if Ede is right... there really need
>> to be some "big advantages" for switching.
>>
>> Mhm.. I also just checked. GPL code can not be used on LGPL code, if I
>> understand correctly:
>> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#SwitchToLGPL
>> but there is also:
>> http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
>> which says there is no way back from GPL/LGP v3 to v2...
>>
>> stefan
>>
>> edgar.sol...@web.de wrote:
>>     
>>> True,
>>>
>>> "or later versions of the GPL X.X" is the backdoor for newer GPL licences 
>>> with more up to date legal definitions and regulations in the old GPL. But 
>>> ... once licensed eg. 3.0 , there is no way back anymore ... without asking 
>>> all copyright holders (code contributors). This becomes especially tricky 
>>> for new code contributions that are automatically GPL3.
>>>
>>> So the question is if the changes in the new welcome by the community.
>>>
>>>
>>> regards ede
>>>
>>>  --
>>>       
>>>> Hei short answer.
>>>>
>>>> If the current license contains the text "or later versions of the GPL
>>>> X.X" then we can switch to V3. I think. But I need to do a bit of
>>>> reading on fsf.org pages and in the source code license annotations.
>>>>
>>>> stefan
>>>>
>>>> Sunburned Surveyor wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Julien made an interesting request that we relicenze OpenJUMP under
>>>>> the GPL version 3. I wanted to discuss this request in a separate
>>>>> thread, because I think it is a very important discussion.
>>>>>
>>>>> My first question would be: Do we have the authority to relicense 
>>>>> OpenJUMP?
>>>>>
>>>>> I would think this authority to relicense OpenJUMP would lie with
>>>>> Vivid Solutions, and all of our contributors that maintain copyright
>>>>> over there code.
>>>>>
>>>>> I believe this means we can't relicense OpenJUMP, even if we wanted
>>>>> to. This is one disadvantage of allowing contributors to keep the
>>>>> copyright to their patches/improvements to OpenJUMP. If we could get
>>>>> Vivid Solutions to agree to relicense the JUMP code in OJ, we'd still
>>>>> have to get agreements from all of our pass contributors.
>>>>>
>>>>> That is going to be tough. :]
>>>>>
>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>
>>>>> The Sunburned Surveyor
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, 
>>>>> CA
>>>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the 
>>>>> Enterprise
>>>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source 
>>>>> participation
>>>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: 
>>>>> SFAD
>>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, 
>>>> CA
>>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the 
>>>> Enterprise
>>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source 
>>>> participation
>>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: 
>>>> SFAD
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
>>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
>>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
>>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>       
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
>> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
>> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
>> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
>> _______________________________________________
>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>>
>>     
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
> -OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
> -Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
> -Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>   


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Open Source Business Conference (OSBC), March 24-25, 2009, San Francisco, CA
-OSBC tackles the biggest issue in open source: Open Sourcing the Enterprise
-Strategies to boost innovation and cut costs with open source participation
-Receive a $600 discount off the registration fee with the source code: SFAD
http://p.sf.net/sfu/XcvMzF8H
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to