Rahkonen Jukka wrote: Hi,
> The service provider is much bigger authority than I. They say this way gives > them a possibility to separate the requests on different servers for sharing > the load in the future. I don't believe really that sending GetCapabilities is > so extra heavy computitional task that it would ever deserve a dedicated > server but this is the way they have decided to use and that's it. I will try > to cascade the service through Mapserver, it should lead to a normal looking > WMS service that could be accessed with OpenJUMP. ok, that looks like another valid scenario. Although I'd agree that GetCapabilities-requests are usually not a performance burden ;-) Best regards, Andreas -- l a t / l o n GmbH Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany phone ++49 +228 18496-11 fax ++49 +228 1849629 http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
