Yup. I guess I do sort of talk about whatever I please on the OJ blog, don't I?

I wonder if I can rename the OpenJUMP blog? I'll have to check that
out on the blogger interface.

The Sunburned Surveyor

On 9/10/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hei again,
>
>
> Sunburned Surveyor schrieb:
> > Stefan,
> >
> > I didn't mean to dig up a bone of contention. Please remember what I
> > laid out on the wiki was just a suggestion. I can delete it at any
> > time.
>
> not yet.. i played around as well ;)
> >
> > I brought up the suggestion of using the SourceForge wiki for two (2) 
> > reasons:
> >
> > [1] Someone suggested the OJ wiki could use a little more structure
> > and organizing.
> yep .. i read that and i agree..
> If i could have a whish.. then i would like to have a complete new "easy
> to use" & "out-of-the-box" wiki-webpage-forum. But such webpage requires
> a server with a database, i.e a CMS,.... as far as i found out (besides
> a host). I think we would need one person fully dedicated to maintain
> such wiki-webpage-forum.
>
> as a minor note: the QGIS side is nice, but for my feeling contains also
> too much information on the first page (due to the use of 3 "frames").
>
> >
> > [2] Larry and Peppe were talking about using the wiki for help in OpenJUMP.
> yes.. i did that too ;) but i think this was before Peppe started the
> doc on the OJ wiki.
>
> >
> > Having said that, I really don't care which wiki we use. If you feel
> > strongly about staying with the OJ wiki we have now then lets do that!
> > (I agree that any transition of the wiki would be a lot of work.)
> >
> > In this case I think the documentation of OJ functions that Peppe has
> > come up with should stay on the OJ wiki and not be moved to the
> > SourceForge wiki.
> mhm.. i wonder what the others think?
>
>
> >
> > You wrote: "And hey... please be carefull to start new wiki's and and so 
> > on..
> > consider the time you can work on that first : there are already 2 more
> > OJ wikis, where i consider one as being completely unnecessary, while
> > the second you rather be renamed due to it's rather personal touch."
> >
> > We have three wikis? I can think of only two (2) wikis. One is at
> > http://openjump.org/wiki/show/HomePage and the other is at
> > http://thejumppilotproject.pbwiki.com/. Where is the third?
>
> ups this was a mistake
>
> >
> > Which wiki would you like to rename? The wiki I have for the JPP?
>
> i meant the openjump blog. As i feel it rather treats OJ indirectly -
> i.e. it should be something like Sunburneds Thoughts on OpenSource GIS
> :o). Anyway.. don't take this latter comment to serious.
>
>
> >
> > The Sunburned Surveyor
> >
> >
> > On 9/10/07, Stefan Steiniger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> On the wiki...
> >>
> >> i am not very happy with the idea of transfering all the stuff of the OJ
> >> wiki to the sourceforge wiki. Only the function-help would i consider so
> >> far.
> >> The point is, that the current wiki is quite established and there is
> >> lots of information on the site. It is further impossible for me to
> >> manage two wikis (or say: i don^t want that!). I also would like to see
> >> at least a split layout into side menu frame and content frame (like the
> >> instiki main page) - but this is not as important as having an
> >> information source.
> >>
> >> what concerns the sourceforge wiki. It is an anlternative, but it comes
> >>  with all the sourceforge stuff - i.e. headers. Which i don't like. I
> >> also think, that only sf-members can have write access.
> >> Furthermore i am not really a fan of heaving separates entries for users
> >> and for developers. It makes the overall wiki-structure more unclear and
> >> may lead to doubled efforts, for which we do not have the man power.
> >>
> >> finally.. i would agree with using the sf wiki to describe the OJ
> >> functionality - but therefore it should have currently only one
> >> main-menu item which is "OJ Functionality". This leaves as room for
> >> later improvements. But generally .. as there has been now done a lots
> >> of effort by Peppe on the current wiki - i would even agree to not start
> >> with SF wiki dure to the maintenance efforts for both.
> >> (And hey... please be carefull to start new wiki's and and so on..
> >> consider the time you can work on that first : there are already 2 more
> >> OJ wikis, where i consider one as being completely unnecessary, while
> >> the second you rather be renamed due to it's rather personal touch)
> >>
> >> my 2cents
> >> stefan
> >>
> >> PS: i may change my mind when Jon will stop providing web space. But we
> >> need also a more "professional" and easy to maintain web site such as
> >> the one QGIS has (i had again a look on xoops - which was used for the
> >> first JPP webpage, but to dive into the setup takes time which i don't
> >> have)
> >>
> >> Giuseppe Aruta schrieb:
> >>>
> >>> */Sunburned Surveyor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/* ha scritto:
> >>>
> >>>     Peppe,
> >>>
> >>>     I would like to try and review some your help documentation for
> >>>     OpenJUMP functions/menu items.
> >>>
> >>>     Do you care if I make these edits directly in the wiki, or should I
> >>>     make them in a separate document so you can review them?
> >>>
> >>>     What do you think about having me copy the content to the new
> >>>     SourceForge JPP Wiki when I am finished with my review?
> >>>
> >>>     The Sunburned Surveyor
> >>>
> >>>     Landon,
> >>>     I answer your letter late since I am working abroad and I cannot see
> >>>     my email regularly.
> >>>
> >>>     You can directly correct the help documentation on wiki pages. This
> >>>     is the fastest way to work, I think.
> >>>     Regarding new
> >>>     SourceForge JPP Wiki, that probabily is the the natural position of
> >>>     the help context. So it is OK to copy it, maybe in the future to move.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Peppe
> >>>
> >>>     Ciao
> >>>
> >>>     Peppe
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail
> >>> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mail/it/taglines/hotmail/nowyoucan/nextgen/*http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> >>> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
> >> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> >> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> >> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> >> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
> >>
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> > Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> > http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
> >
> >
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
> Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
>

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Jump-pilot-devel mailing list
Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel

Reply via email to