I completely agree. The Sunburned Surveyor
On 8/29/07, Martin Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I just read over the spec for the GML Simple Features Profile. It does > define a severely restricted schema format, so that's a good thing. But > it still requires parsing a schema file, and it stills allows a fair > amount of flexibility and features. > > It might not take *too* long to code up a SFP reader & writer, making > use of an XML parser. But it would still be quite a bit more work than > a parser for the formats that Paul & I have proposed. > > -- > Martin Davis > Senior Technical Architect > Refractions Research, Inc. > (250) 383-3022 > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Jump-pilot-devel mailing list > Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
