btw.. on the naming: users from other platforms should be able to distinguish their version from the others. further i think endings are important (otherwise i would have not known how to start OJ on osx)
Andreas Schmitz schrieb: > Stephan Holl wrote: > > Hi, > >>> Can anyone on linux give the attached script a test and make sure it >>> works before we check it in >>> What file name shall I give the checked in version? I like just using >>> openjump rather than having a .sh and platform on the end. Although >>> we could create a generic build that has all of the start scripts and >>> a UNIX specific one that just has the openjump executable. >>> At some point I also want to create a Gentoo ebuild for jump. > >> I tested it on debian and it runs out of the box. I do not have any >> dot-files in my home though, so I could not test this. > >> It comes up as usual and I have noticed no problems after a short test. > > I tested it as well on a Debian box, and it's working fine as expected. > >> I strongly vote for naming it openjump-unix.sh to indicate that it is >> the startscript for *NIX-like OS. > > I've got no preferences for the name, although shorter is better IMHO. > > Since we've got no MacOS here, how're we going to proceed? > > Regards, Andreas ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Jump-pilot-devel mailing list Jump-pilot-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jump-pilot-devel
