> There are POSIX standards for new programming language function names?
No, but you've implemented functions with POSIX names
> yes, ls() could be a better name
In the REPL, I might
julia> cd("projects")
And want to
julia> ls()
to see what's there
But, I probably wouldn't want to do that in Julia file
rd = readdir(pwd()) # ls() doesn't make sense here
So, maybe alias them?
Aidy
On 9/14/2016 at 5:41 PM, "Stefan Karpinski" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>There are POSIX standards for new programming language function
>names? But
>yes, ls() could be a better name.
>
>On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Adrian Lewis
><[email protected]>
>wrote:
>
>> > You can find a thread/issue where this is discussed. Some
>group decided
>> to call it readdir() and like it more. I just got used to it. I
>think it's
>> silly, but it's just syntax.
>>
>> I thought it might be an idea to stick with POSIX standards.
>>
>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 4:40:03 PM UTC+1, Chris
>Rackauckas
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, September 14, 2016 at 7:36:18 AM UTC-7, Jacob
>Quinn wrote:
>>>>
>>>> readdir()
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:34 AM, Adrian Lewis
><[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In the filesystem package, if we have pwd() and cd(), why do
>we not
>>>>> have ls()?
>>>>>
>>>>> Aidy
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
